Cases 1 - 10 of 50
HARRELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE JARMAINE HARRELL
Defendant:
PAYNE and ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HARRELL v. WRIGHT
as 3:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Respondent:
SHANNON K. WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARRELL et al v. ROBINSON
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
QUINYATLE J HARRELL, DASHONE BURTON, GREENE ALGERNON and others
Defendant:
ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, ZUBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Marthakis
as 3:2022cv00606
Plaintiff:
Raveon Harrell
Defendant:
Nancy Marthais and Dr Nancy Marthakis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. WEDDING et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE J. HARRELL
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, ZUBAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mary Harrell v Christopher Figgs et al
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
MARY HARRELL, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Richard Harrell, Deceased and Mary Harrell
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER FIGGS, J&R SCHUGEL TRUCKING, INC. and J & R Schugel Trucking Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
John Whiteleather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
