Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Martin John Borden v. David Stevens et al
as 3:2026cv00448
Plaintiff:
Martin John Borden
Defendant:
David Stevens and Aaron Harroun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polk v. Nevada State Board of State Prison Commissioners, et al.
as 26-2917
Plaintiff:
RENARD TRUMAN POLK
Defendant:
NEVADA STATE BOARD OF STATE PRISON COMMISSIONERS, DAVID DRUMMOND, KARA LEGRAND and others
Riggs v. Davis, et al.
as 26-2142
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HARVEY RIGGS
Defendant:
SCOTT DAVIS, KARA LEGRAND, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Melendez v. Tillman et al
as 3:2026cv00122
Defendant:
Abraham Tillman, Kenneth Harroun, Nathanjah Breitenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soule et al v. Cimino
as 2:2026cv00560
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Soule, Luis Armenta, Joshua Harroun and others
Defendant:
Michael Cimino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonderer v. Harroun et al
as 2:2025cv02414
Plaintiff:
Devin Bonderer
Defendant:
Aaron Harroun, Joseph Mainwaring, Bobby Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. City of Aurora, Colorado, et al
as 25-1142
Plaintiff:
WYOMA MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a municipality and DOUGLAS HARROUN, individually
Williams v. Kramer et al
as 4:2025cv04012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
Nellie Boone, Emily Harroun, Kasey Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00607
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Malone, Caseworker and others
Plaintiff:
Daine Anton Crawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reta v. Harroun et al
as 1:2024cv03212
Defendant:
Daniel Aguirre, Douglas Harroun and City of Aurora, Colorado
Plaintiff:
Juan Ruiz Reta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef - Fed. Question - Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
