Cases 1 - 9 of 9
James Turner v. Harry Nicoletti, et al
as 13-4826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY NICOLETTI, individually and as an employee of SCI-Pgh, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MELVIN S. LOCKETT, individually and as Superintendent of SCI- Pgh and others
Defendant - Pro Se Appellee:
TORY KELLY, individually and as an employee of SCI-Pgh
REED v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv00477
Plaintiff:
LEROY REED
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN COLEMAN, STEVEN GATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TURNER v. NICOLETTI et al
as 2:2012cv01855
Plaintiff:
JAMES TURNER
Defendant:
HARRY NICOLETTI, JR. , TORY KELLY, SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MICHAELS et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv01729
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAELS , BRIAN OLINGER , HARRY NICOLETTI and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL , SHIRLEY MOORE SMEAL , GARY HILER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROE v. NICOLETTI et al
as 2:2012cv01509
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROE
Defendant:
HARRY NICOLETTI, JR. , KEVIN FREISS, TORY KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. NICOLETTI et al
as 2:2012cv00368
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
HARRY NICOLETTI, JR., MELVIN LOCKETT, MARTIN KOVACS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEITH v. FREISS et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VEITH
Defendant:
KEVIN FREISS, HARRY NICOLETTI, JR., MELVIN LOCKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. NICOLETTI et al
as 2:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
JOHN R.S. DOE
Defendant:
HARRY NICOLETTI, JR., BERGER, MOHRING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. NICOLETTI et al
as 2:2011cv01221
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
HARRY NICOLETTI, JR., MELVIN LOCKETT, MARTIN KOVACS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
