Cases 1 - 10 of 1,358
Cheron Hayes v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11229
Plaintiff:
CHERON HAYES
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC. and DISNEY GIFT CARD SERVICES, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 24-11073
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, JACOB T. HAYES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tracy Sanders, et al v. Reid Forrester, et al
as 24-1699
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Sanders and David Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Reid K. Forrester, in his individual capacity, Shalonn K. Curls, in her individual capacity, Rodney J. Campbell, in his individual capacity and others
KENNEDY v. B & C TOWING et al
as 2:2024cv04458
Plaintiff:
MELVENE KENNEDY
Defendant:
B & C TOWING, ANGEL CONCEPCION and IVORY HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
