Cases 1 - 10 of 48
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
HAYES v. QSI OF GEORGIA LLC et al
as 7:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
RECO HAYES
Defendant:
QSI OF GEORGIA LLC doing business as QSI LLC doing business as QSI SANITATION and GLENN JONES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
HAYES v. MCLENDON
as 1:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
ANDRE HAYES
Respondent:
TRE MCLENDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HAYES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
VICKI LYNN HAYES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BRAND v. MONROE et al
as 3:2021cv00130
Plaintiff:
DAVID L BRAND, JR
Defendant:
CITY OF MONROE, S HAYES, M BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WHITE v. PALMER et al
as 1:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WASHINGTON WHITE, JR
Defendant:
SGT GABRIEL PALMER, D O LANELY, D O WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. HAYES et al
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Nurse WILLIAMS, JANE DOE, CPT JERROMA WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE DEMOND JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
