Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Sorbello v. Agco Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Sorbello
Defendant:
Agco Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Cheek v. Admiral Valve, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv06666
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cheek
Defendant:
Admiral Valve, LLC, Air Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cheek v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv06630
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cheek
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
DOUGHERTY et al v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv03204
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, MICHELE A DOUGHERTY and JAMES EDWARD DOUGHERTY, III
Defendant:
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY, ABB, INC., ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Dunbar v. ABB Motors and Mechanical Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv04069
Defendant:
Howden North America Inc., Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. A Delaware Corporation doing business as Ingalls Shipbuilding formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems formerly known as Ingalls Shipbuilding, a division of Litton Systems, Inc., Velan Valve Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
James Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosalie Jean Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00811
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps, Inc:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To The Delaval Separator Company:
Alfa Laval Inc
Ued As Successor-in-interest To Thursh Company And H.A. Thrush Company:
Amtrol Inc
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, CLA-VAL Co, Cameron International Corporation and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chapman Valve Company, Deming Pump Company, Jenkin:
Crane Co
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company:
Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Sierra Talc Company And United Talc Company:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu:
FMC Corporation
Ued As Successor To Edward Valve, Inc:
Flowserve US Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Henry Valve Co:
Henry Technologies Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Delaval Turbine, Inc., And C.H. Wheeler Manufactur:
IMO Industries
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Robertshaw Controls Company Dba Fulton Sylphon Val:
Invensys Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Jean Nelson
Ued Successor-in-interest To Klipfel Valves, Inc:
O C Keckley Company
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To International Talc Company:
RT Vanderbilt Company Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries, Inc:
Zurn Industries LLC
Nelson et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00793
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc, Amtrol Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Jean Nelson and Rosalie Jean Nelson
CARDARO et al v. AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv66763
Plaintiff:
TERRY CARDARO and JO ANN CARDARO
Defendant:
AEROJET GENERAL CORPORATION, AGCO CORPORATION, ALFA LAVAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAMANTE et al v. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLP et al
as 2:2010cv69387
Plaintiff:
NOLA SALAMANTE , EDGARDO SALAMANTE, JR. and MELISSA SALAMANTE
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLP, METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION, CROWN, CORK & SEAL USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SALAMANTE et al v. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLP et al
as 2:2010cv69386
Plaintiff:
NOLA SALAMANTE , EDGARDO SALAMANTE, JR. and MELISSA SALAMANTE
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLP, METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION, CROWN, CORK & SEAL USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
