Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Erwin v. Hill-Rom Company Inc et al
as 7:2019cv00132
Defendant:
Hillenbrand Industries, Inc., Hill-Rom Company, Inc., Hillenbrand Industries Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Alice Erwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Funeral Consumers Alliance Inc, et al v. Service Corporation Intl, et al
as 10-20719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FUNERAL CONSUMERS ALLIANCE INC, GLORIA JACCARINO BENDER, ANTHONY J JACCARINO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC., HILLENBRAND INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Funeral Consumers Alliance Inc, et al v. Service Corporation Internatio, et al
as 09-16
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
FUNERAL CONSUMERS ALLIANCE INC, GLORIA JACCARINO BENDER, ANTHONY J JACCARINO and others
Defendant - Respondent:
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL, ALDERWOODS GROUP INC., STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
FLETCHER v. HILLENBRAND INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 1:2008mc00215
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FLETCHER
Defendant:
HILLENBRAND INDUSTRIES, INC., BATESVILLE SERVICES, INC., BATESVILLE CASKET COMPANY INC. and others
AT&T Corp. v. Hillenbrand Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv08233
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
Hillenbrand Industries, Inc. and Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VONBERG et al v. HILLENBRAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2007cv03835
Plaintiff:
DANIEL VONBERG and JAMY VONBERG
Defendant:
HILLENBRAND INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fletcher v. Hillenbrand Industries, Inc
as 4:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
Richard Fletcher
Defendant:
Hillenbrand Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Robinson v. Hillenbrand Industries Inc et al
as 4:2007cv00742
Plaintiff:
Candace D Robinson and Candace D Robinson
Defendant:
Hillenbrand Industries Inc and Batesville Casket Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
