Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Noeller et al v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv01354
Plaintiff:
Shawn T Hinkle and Kristin N Noeller
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kelly
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department, Gina M Lumia, Guy Marchal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, M Rios, T Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hinkle v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Hinkle
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinkle v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04404
Plaintiff:
Terry L Hinkle
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinkle #169772 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv02501
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hinkle, Sr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinkle v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2014cv01470
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Durango Jail
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ray Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfaro-Maldonado v. Hinkle
as 2:2013cv02296
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Alfaro-Maldonado
Defendant:
Richard Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khalafala v. Hinkle et al
as 2:2011cv01563
Plaintiff:
Khalafala Moham Khalafala
Defendant:
Richard Hinkle, Kimberly Funchess, F Arangure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
