Cases 1 - 10 of 323
Hinton v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01212
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hinton
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024ct03071
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Todd Ishee and Teresa O'Brian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Javad Valad, Brian Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Janiah Monroe, et al v. Steven Bowman, et al
as 23-3371
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANIAH MONROE, MARILYN MELENDEZ, LYDIA H. VISION and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN BOWMAN, MELVIN HINTON and LATOYA HUGHES
Hinton v. Biden
as 5:2023ct03343
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hung Duong Nguon et al v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09937
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Nicolas Sererato, Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Getz, Jr. v. State of Delaware Board of Parole, et al
as 23-3014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. GETZ, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE BOARD OF PAROLE, DAVID HENDERSON, JESSICA VOROUS and others
Vilaychith Khouanmany v. Shawn Hinton et al
as 5:2023cv02190
Plaintiff:
Vilaychith Khouanmany
Defendant:
Shawn Hinton, Nurse Esther Babalola and Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
