Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McGinity v. Today's Hotel Corporation,
as 3:2026cv10579
Plaintiff:
Sean McGinity
Defendant:
Today's Hotel Corporation, doing business as Holiday Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2026cv06098
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Holiday
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Ezell v. Strada et al
as 2:2026cv03192
Plaintiff:
Keith Ezell
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Henry Holiday and Sgt. FNU Bargery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Holiday CVS, LLC
as 1:2026cv26326
Plaintiff:
Brayan A. Brown
Defendant:
Holiday CVS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv11045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SAYERS v. PHOENIX PHYSICAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01845
Plaintiff:
HOLIDAY SAYERS
Defendant:
PHOENIX PHYSICAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, LLC and PHOENIX REHABILITATION AND HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Kenyatta
as 26-2458
Defendant:
KASEEM WILSON, EFRAIN SANCHEZ, SAMUEL RIVERA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
