Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jackson
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fryer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel v. Fenner et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
CessanadaKha Jahish Israel
Defendant:
Duane Edward Fenner, Holmes, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hocking v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hocking
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, D Green, M Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattingly v. McCune et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattingly
Defendant:
Judge Marc McCune, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and Public Defender Arron Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tayborn v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Reginald Tayborn
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, C Hendrick, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. AmerCable Corporation
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Steven Holmes
Defendant:
Amercable Corporation doing business as Nexans Amercable, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
