Cases 1 - 10 of 100
United States of America v. Younes et al
as 8:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Younes, Linda Younes and Margarita Younes-Holz
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Holz v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2026cv03153
Plaintiff:
Ryan Holz
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Holz v. Nolan
as 5:2026cv01513
Plaintiff:
Timothy E Holz
Defendant:
Dee Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cefaratti v. Ostrover et al
as 1:2026cv05151
Plaintiff:
Michael Cefaratti
Defendant:
Douglas I. Ostrover, Marc S. Lipschultz, Alan Kirshenbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Detrail Young v. Robert Hartman et al
as 3:2026cv00410
Plaintiff:
Detrail Young
Defendant:
Robert Hartman and Jeffery Holz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANR Pipeline Company, LLC v. Cooper et al
as 1:2026cv05664
Plaintiff:
ANR Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
Adam Cooper, Kendall Land LLC, Robert B Lawrie and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
PHILLIPS, JR. v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2026cv00373
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2026cv00468
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Jeffery Holz, Daniel Omler, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holz v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv10670
Plaintiff:
Fernando Holz
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
