Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-13573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dilley v. Johnson
as 18-441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Dilley
Defendant - Appellee:
Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security
Defendant:
Rand Beers, Secretary (Acting) Department of Homeland Security Agency, Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, John F. Kelly, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00685
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
NORMAN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv01538
Plaintiff:
DAWN NORMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amanda Laoye, et al v. Homeland Security Agency Dir, et al
as 10-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMANDA C. LAOYE and AKINTOYE OMATSOLA LAOYE
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMELAND SECURITY AGENCY DIR, ASSISTANT SEC OF HOMELAND SECURITY and US IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Shirley Ramirez v. Atty Gen USA, et al
as 10-2478
Petitioner:
SHIRLEY RAMIREZ
Respondent:
ATTY GEN USA, HOMELAND SECURITY AGENCY DIR and US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00789
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
