Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HERNDON v. DOVE et al
as 3:2026cv03529
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A HERNDON
Defendant:
S DOVE, CHARLEY HORTEN, UNIDENTIFIED PERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNDON v. HORTEN et al
as 3:2026cv01795
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A HERNDON
Defendant:
CHARLEY HORTEN, BUTLER, PICKETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy v. Thornell, et al.
as 25-78
Defendant:
GOLDTOOTH, First Name Unknown, 5297, RONALD EVANS, VELASCO, First Name Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. NEALY
Serna v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00663
Defendant:
FNU Stevenson, FNU Horten, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez Serna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
DIONTE JERMAINE DAVIS and CHRISTOPHER HORTEN
Defendant:
R QUINN, C HORTEN, K EMMIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Richard M Johnson, Julie Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennison #143931 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02516
Plaintiff:
Andre Dennison, Andre Almond Dennison and Andre A Dennison
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Horten and Unknown Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RITCHWOOD v. HORTEN et al
as 2:2023cv22883
Plaintiff:
JASON RITCHWOOD
Defendant:
THOMAS HORTEN, MIL VAL MOTORS INC. DBA ESSEX COUNTY TOWING, TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEEPLES v. ALLEN et al
as 3:2021cv04646
Plaintiff:
EARL PHILLIP PEEPLES
Defendant:
ALLEN, BROWN, COLONEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wicker #49817 v. Horten et al
as 2:2021cv01791
Plaintiff:
George Milton Wicker
Defendant:
Unknown Horten and Unknown Brier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
