Cases 1 - 10 of 45
HOSKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
TITO HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Beers v. Northumberland County et al
as 4:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Sherry Beers
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Bruce Kovach, Samuel J. Schiccatano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAndrew v. Northumberland County et al
as 4:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Timothy McAndrew
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Bruce Kovach, Samuel J. Schiccatano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoskins v. Kauffman et al
as 3:2021cv00301
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, John Wetzel and Kevin Kauffman
Petitioner:
Harold Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COUNTY OF BUTLER et al v. THOMAS W. WOLF et al
as 2:2020cv00677
Plaintiff:
R.W. MCDONALD & SONS, INC., NANCY GIFFORD, COUNTY OF FAYETTE and others
Defendant:
THOMAS W. WOLF and RACHEL LEVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOSKINS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01639
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
HARRY HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOSKINS v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK et al
as 2:2019cv00027
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK and ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN M. HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOSKINS v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv05347
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER ESSURE INC, BAYER U.S., LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KATRINA HOSKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hoskins v. Superintendent Kauffman et al
as 3:2018cv01701
Petitioner:
Harold V Hoskins
Respondent:
Attorney General of Pennsylvania and Superintendent Kauffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
