Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Torres v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023cv00792
Petitioner:
Juan Torres
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mid-Atlantic Regional Director, Associate Warden Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Kallis et al
as 2:2017cv04244
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
S. Kallis, Dunn, Other Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03794
Plaintiff:
Marilyn M. Howell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03367
Plaintiff:
Karen Howell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reneau et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03342
Plaintiff:
Laura Reneau , Norma Estrada , Alicia Murillo and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems, LLC , Astora Womens Health Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv02313
Plaintiff:
Judy L. Howell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webster et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02189
Plaintiff:
Eva Webster and Richard Howell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01600
Plaintiff:
Gayle Howell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11622
Plaintiff:
Daphene Howell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
