Cases 1 - 10 of 19
John Kister v. Maria Wynn, et al
as 24-10192
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREW KISTER
Defendant:
MARIA WYNN, TAHIR SIDDIQ, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
William N. Lucy v. Tahir Siddiq, et al
as 23-11578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM N. LUCY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAHIR TAHIR SIDDIQ, FOUNTAIN CF WARDEN, MRS. KRAUEL, R.N. D.O.N. and others
Bolton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00721
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bolton and Timothy Franklin Bolton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Hugh Hood, Michael Borwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kister v. Wynn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00222
Defendant:
Maria Wynn, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Tahir Siddiq and others
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucy v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00498
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Hugh Hood, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Tahir Siddiq and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
Mark Allen Lovelace
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Dr. Peasants and Hugh Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Kelly v. Ms. Ambroski, et al
as 15-13190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. AMBROSKI, CORIZON MEDICAL, HUGH HOOD and others
Barber v. Corizon Health et al
as 2:2015cv00997
Plaintiff:
James Edward Barber, Jr.
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Cheryl Price, Hugh Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Coker v. Corizon Medical Services, Inc., et al
as 15-11414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY G. COKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARRY BARRETT and others
Jeffrey McClellan v. Hugh Hood, et al
as 14-11611
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ALLEN MCCLELLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HUGH HOOD, WEBB, D. GOULD and others
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
