Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00788
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20412
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HUGO ROMERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dolores et al v. Titan Construction Services LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11056
Plaintiff:
EFREN VALENTIN, LUIS CARCAMO, STEVEN MORALES and others
Defendant:
Juan Garcia, Amador Garcia, MUCU CONTRACTING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ralon et al v. Mi Cocina Ltd et al
as 3:2017cv02532
Plaintiff:
Haley Browning, Jamielynn Puniwai-Kujawa, Jose Hernandez and others
Defendant:
M Crowd Restaurant Group Inc, M Crowd GP LLC and Mi Cocina Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Romero-Raigoza v. Lynch
as 15-9575
Petitioner:
HUGO ROMERO-RAIGOZA
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, United States Attorney General
US v. Maximiliano Romero
as 10-4606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, a/k/a Hugo Valentine Hernandez, a/k/a Maximiliano Hugo, a/k/a Hugo Valentine, a/k/a Maximiliano Hernandez, a/k/a Rafael Antonio Gomez, a/k/a Romero Maximiliano, a/k/a Hugo Romero
BARCIA et al v. CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, L.P. et al
as 2:2008cv06297
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO BARCIA, BRYON BETHUNE, RUSSELL C. COMPESI and others
Defendant:
CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, L.P. and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-25
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv60573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
