Cases 21 - 30 of 107
AMAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02870
Plaintiff:
HUGUES AMAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCAPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Kifwa
as 21-1733
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MUKONKOLE HUGE KIFWA, a/k/a Ndowa Adrien Lushiku, a/k/a Adrien Ndowa, a/k/a Adrien Lushiku, a/k/a Hugue Kifwa
Interested Party:
LLOYD'S BANKING GROUP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv06376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jean-Charles et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv03803
Plaintiff:
Hugue Jean-Charles and Audry Hugue Jean-Charles
Defendant:
The City of New York, Eric Gonzales, Chris Maribel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Kifwa
as 21-1377
Defendant / Appellant:
MUKONKOLE HUGE KIFWA, a/k/a Ndowa Adrien Lushiku, a/k/a Adrien Ndowa, a/k/a Adrien Lushiku, a/k/a Hugue Kifwa
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Kifwa
as 21-1373
Defendant / Appellant:
MUKONKOLE HUGE KIFWA, a/k/a Ndowa Adrien Lushiku, a/k/a Adrien Ndowa, a/k/a Adrien Lushiku, a/k/a Hugue Kifwa
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
LLOYD'S BANKING GROUP
George Huguely, V v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6452
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE W. HUGUELY, V
Hugues v. Tyson et al
as 1:2021cv00730
Defendant:
DEAN BANKS, ROBERT THURBER, GAURDIE E. BANISTER and others
Plaintiff:
GERVAT HUGUES
In Re Quantumscape Corporation Derivative Litigation
as 3:2021cv00989
Defendant:
Fritz Prinz, Justin Mirro, Volkswagen Group of America Investments, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HUGUES GERVAT and Kathleen Costello
Gervat v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Marta R. Stewart, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
