Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Menendez v. Timberblinds, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00914
Plaintiff:
Victor Menendez
Defendant:
Timberblinds, LLC, Peter Boleneus and Hunter Douglas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Menendez
as 4:2021cv00741
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas, Inc.
Defendant:
Victor Menendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Menendez v. Hunter Douglas, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Hunter Douglas, Inc., Drew Hirshfeld and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff:
Victor Menendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Isha Aguirre v. Hunter Douglas, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00105
Plaintiff:
Isha Aguirre
Defendant:
Christopher Outlaw, Hunter Douglas, Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holland et al v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.
as 0:2018cv60479
Plaintiff:
Jenna Holland
Defendant:
Hunter Douglas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HUNTER DOUGLAS, INC. v. LANTEX USA, LLC
as 2:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
HUNTER DOUGLAS, INC.
Defendant:
LANTEX USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
as 3:2017cv01069
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
as 1:2016cv01940
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Budget Blinds LLC
as 1:2016cv01938
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas, Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Budget Blinds LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Springs Window Fashions, LLC v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00449
Defendant:
Hunter Douglas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Springs Window Fashions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
