Cases 21 - 30 of 757
Chad Vice v. State of Iowa, et al
as 23-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chad M. Vice
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Iowa, Jana Hacker and Iowa Department of Corrections
HACKER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv16565
Plaintiff:
KHRISTY HACKER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballard v. Reitz et al
as 4:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Cory R. Ballard
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Reitz and Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hacker v. LeRud et al
as 3:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Lauren Sue Hacker
Defendant:
Alicia L. LeRud, Angie Taylor and Kathryn Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Aufderheide v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv01026
Petitioner:
Joan L. Aufderheide
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Locke v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Locke
Defendant:
Denease Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hacker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-1131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William R. Hacker
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Kennemore v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv00951
Petitioner:
Daniel Kennemore
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Kevin D. McGee
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson v. Hacker et al
as 2:2023cv04141
Petitioner:
Dean Davidson and Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent:
Denise Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
