Cases 1 - 10 of 197
United States of America v. Binh Tieu
as 24-1310
Defendant:
CUONG MACH BINH TIEU, Steve, Hak Se Wui and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Malcolm A. Bey v. Keyes European Dealership
as 2:2023cv05400
Plaintiff:
Malcolm A. Bey
Defendant:
Keyes European Dealership and Hak Inc. doing business as Keyes European Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01307
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Hak Yin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reinig et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff:
Tina Reinig, Gloria Grover, Mary May and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Labor Standards Act
Express Jewelry Enterprises, Inc v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
as 2:2023cv10615
Plaintiff:
Express Jewelry Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Haks Jewelry and Express Jewelry Enterprises, Inc Doing business as Haks Jewelry
Defendant:
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
USA v. Hakeem Curry
as 23-1074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HAKEEM CURRY, aka IBN aka E.T. HAK aka MR. EDDIE aka DOUGH BOY aka MR. GORE
USA v. Hikeem Torrence
as 22-2803
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HIKEEM TORRENCE, aka HAK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
