Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Scott v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Sarah Huckabee, Arkansas Division of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galbreath v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Haley Marie Galbreath
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McHam v. Does
as 4:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Haley McHam
Defendant:
Does Officers, Yell County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Does
as 4:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Shyda Stine
Defendant:
Does Officers, Yell County Jail, Does Officers, Guard Haley, Guard Andrew, Yell County Jail and Elkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galbreath v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Haley Galbreath
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. McClaim et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
M McClaim, Mississippi County Detention Center, Haley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eighmy et al
as 5:2021cv05159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Smith, Jr., Linsay Sue McGinnis, W.J.S. and others
Defendant:
Judge Eric Dell Eighmy, Taney County 46th Judicial Court, Taney County Probate Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Dooms et al
as 5:2021cv05034
Defendant:
Haley Rhodes, Adriana Pineda and Dillon Dooms
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Saline County Detention Center
as 4:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Saline County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Haley Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Does
as 4:2020cv01312
Plaintiff:
Haley Hernandez
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
