Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 706
Marek et al v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03216
Plaintiff: Matt Marek, Debbie Hale, Stephen Reeves and others
Defendant: ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hale et al v. Primary Residential Mortgage Inc
as 4:2024cv00347
Plaintiff: Delvin Hale and Monica Hale
Defendant: Primary Residential Mortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
USA v. John Hale
as 24-5362
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHN HALE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02929
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Greg Hale, et al v. ARcare, Inc
as 24-1726
Plaintiff: Greg Hale, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Melissa Johnson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Alicia Gilmore, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant: ARcare, Inc, originally named as ARcare
Pinkans v. Hale et al
as 8:2024cv00767
Plaintiff: Michael Scott Pinkans
Defendant: Matthew B. Hale and Harley E. Riedel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Darius Hale
as 24-1270
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DARIUS HALE
Jewell Smokeless Coal Corporation v. DOWCP
as 24-1081
Petitioner: JEWELL SMOKELESS COAL CORPORATION
Respondent: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ROGER L. HALE, SR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16067
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?