Cases 41 - 50 of 144
Glaze v. Hamilton County et al (TV1)
as 1:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Deputy Charlene Choate, Deputy Patrick Moore, Sgt. Mickey Rountree and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Glaze Personal Representative of Estate of James Glaze and Sharon Glaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2020cv01158
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hammond
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Arrington v. County et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
Reginald Arrington, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Cook, Sgt. Mickey Rountree, Lori Choate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Sell et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Neal Pinkston, Chattanooga, TN Housing Authority, Andrew Basler and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02855
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hammond v. Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01099
Plaintiff:
Germma Hammond
Defendant:
Floor and Decor Outlets of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Toney v. Hamilton County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2019cv00342
Plaintiff:
Charles Toney
Defendant:
John Does I-X, Blake Kilpatrick, Jim Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howse v. Hammond et al
as 1:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Carl Lamont Howse and Carl Lamont Howse, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Rumbaugh, Candace Hammond, f/n/u Peon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government et al
as 1:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Deputy Mike Mullins, John Doe, Deputy Nathan Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Charles Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isom v. Hammond
as 1:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
Darick Isom
Defendant:
Jim Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
