Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Archibald et al v. City of Creola et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Mandy C. Archibald, Charie D. McSwain and Randy W. McSwain
Defendant:
City of Creola, Mark Howell, Frank Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brady v. City of Creola, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Joshua Brady
Defendant:
City of Creola, Alabama, Frank Hammond and Gary Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Larousse et al v. Hammond et al
as 1:2018cv00080
Plaintiff:
Joel Paul Larousse and Brenda Larousse
Defendant:
Edward Lee Hammond, Jr., Michael Wesley Jolley , AAA Aluminum Enclosures, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammonds v. Myers
as 1:2016cv00213
Petitioner:
Andre Hammonds
Respondent:
Walter T. Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. White City Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc00059
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
White City Partners, LLC, William J. Rish, Jr. and Michael Hammond
SE Property Holdings, LLC v. White City Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc00002
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
White City Partners, LLC, William J. Rish, Jr. and Michael Hammond
Hammond v. State of Alabama
as 1:2013cv00169
Petitioner:
Jerry Hammond
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
Cedric Floyd
Defendant:
Grover Smith, Matthew Hammonds, Stephen M. Billy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Terry et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2009cv00722
Plaintiff:
Joseph Terry and Jonah Terry
Defendant:
Grover Smith, Bruce Shue, John T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
