Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United States of America v. Murphy-Thomas et al
as 2:2019mc03856
Garnishee:
John Hancock Retirement Plan Services, LLC
Defendant:
Christi Murphy-Thomas
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Bowman v. Hancock et al
as 3:2018cv00656
Defendant:
Sid Lockhart and Teddy Hancock
Plaintiff:
Edith Carlette Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Johnson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Jefferson Dunn, Joseph Wombles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. City of Opelika, Alabama et al
as 3:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Michael Davidson
Defendant:
City of Opelika, Alabama and Phillip Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Daryl Edwin Smith Irrevocable Trust et al v. PNC Mortgage
as 3:2012cv01085
Defendant:
PNC Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Daryl Edwin Smith Irrevocable Trust , William Van Jacoway , Daryl Edwin Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Abney v. Stewart et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
Robert Calvin Abney
Defendant:
Clay Stewart and Lt. Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
