Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Moncial et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 3:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
Brian Moncial, Terri L. Monical, PL and others
Defendant:
John Anthony Dossey, TERRY J. STIGDON, Misty M Bullerdick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
P.L. et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 3:2020cv00169
Defendant:
TERRY J. STIGDON, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, John Anthony Dossey and others
Plaintiff:
PL, Terri L Monical, BD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03693
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407
COLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
H. CHRISTIAN DEBUYN, DAVID DONAHUE, J. WYNN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. COLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HANKS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02758
Petitioner:
GARY L. HANKS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BECKER et al v. ANTHEM, INC.
as 1:2015cv00230
Defendant:
ANTHEM, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HANK BECKER and JOHN L. MCAFFRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
WOODRING v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00165
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, ROBERT BUGHER, ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN N. WOODRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00635
Defendant:
JENIFER ADAMS, BILLY ALLAN, AMES and others
Plaintiff:
JESSIE L. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MASSEY v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00481
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
CLIFTON T. MASSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MASSEY v. HANKS
as 1:2013cv00482
Respondent:
CRAIG HANKS
Petitioner:
CLIFTON T. MASSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
