Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Purisima et al v. County of Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Donald Payne, Jr., Jacky Rosen, Abby Finkenauer and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-100, United States of America and Anton Purisima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. Clarke
as 3:2019cv00914
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Hank Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wright et al
as 3:2019cv00859
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Brent Wright
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Hank Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Shafer Law Firm
as 2:2019cv00428
Defendant:
John Does 1-25 and Shafer Law Firm, PC
Plaintiff:
Tedra Hanks, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hanks v. Harvard Collection Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00541
Plaintiff:
Tendra Hanks
Defendant:
John Does 1-25, Harvard Collection Services, Inc. and Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LAUREL GARDENS, LLC et al v. MCKENNA et al
as 2:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
Laurel Gardens, LLC , AMERICAN WINTER SERVICES, LLC , LAUREL GARDEN HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MCKENNA, Michael McKenna, MAT SITE MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hanks v. Prince Edward Circuit Court et al
as 3:2017cv00336
Petitioner:
Winsten Alphonso Hanks
Respondent:
Prince Edward Circuit Court, Antonio Pierre Jackson, Virginia State Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cansler v. Hanks et al
as 1:2016cv01589
Plaintiff:
Elton Cansler
Defendant:
Alan A. Hanks , Edwin C. Roessler, Jr. and Fairfax County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
