Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,157
Duhon v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff: Hannah Alise Duhon
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
THOMPSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06845
Plaintiff: HANNAH M THOMPSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gilbeau v. Deml et al
as 2:2024cv00632
Plaintiff: Louis Ray Gilbeau, Jr.
Defendant: Nicholas Deml, Michael Lyon, Gregory Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbeau v. Deml et al
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff: Louis Ray Gilbeau, Jr.
Defendant: Nicholas Deml, Hannah Pfadenhauer and Max Titus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglass v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05434
Plaintiff: Hannah R. Douglass
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brian Ducksworth v. Hannah Utter
as 24-1975
Plaintiff: BRIAN A. DUCKSWORTH
Defendant: HANNAH UTTER
Vermont CA Gardens, LP v. Shirley Hull et al
as 2:2024cv04505
Plaintiff: Vermont CA Gardens, LP
Defendant: Shirley Hull and Hannah Norman
Robert Longo, Jr. v. Hannah Trostle, et al
as 24-1981
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. LONGO, JR.
Defendant: HANNAH TROSTLE, RNS, SCI-Camp Hill, MR.. ARQUELLES, SCI-Camp Hill and DR. VOORSTAD, SCI-Camp Hill
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY HANNAH RINGLER
as 1:2024mc00070
Not Yet Classified: REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY HANNAH RINGLER
Diaz Deleon (PS) v. Linnemeyer et al
as 1:2024cv01494
Plaintiff: Brandon Lee Diaz Deleon
Defendant: August Linnemeyer, Tiffany Mizelle, Jessica Linnemeyer-Schlagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?