Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Williams v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00206
Plaintiff:
Michael Dylan Williams
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe Defendants, Sgt. Reginald Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atkins et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00103
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., John Doe, John Doe, II and others
Plaintiff:
Karole Atkins and Rick Atkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Accord v. Anderson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Polk County, Tennessee, Hamilton County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Accord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carnell v. Hardeman County Government
as 1:2021cv01012
Plaintiff:
Heather D. Carnell
Defendant:
Hardeman County Government
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Bates v. Hardeman County Government, et. al.
as 1:2020cv02869
Defendant:
Hardeman County Government and Hardeman County Ambulance Service
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Bates
Bates v. Hardeman County Government, et. al.
as 2:2020cv02869
Defendant:
Hardeman County Government and Hardeman County Ambulance Service
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Bates
Damron v. Hardeman County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2020cv01239
Defendant:
Hall, Hardeman County Correctional Facility, All Staff HCCF and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby R. Damron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Hardeman County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2020cv01157
Defendant:
Vincent Hunt and Hardeman County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
danita woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCord v. Hardeman County Government et al
as 1:2020cv01109
Defendant:
Mayor Jimmy Sain, Hardeman County Government and Hardeman County Ambulance Service
Plaintiff:
Whitney McCord
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthews v. Hardeman County Corr. Facility et al
as 1:2020cv01081
Plaintiff:
Antwane Matthews
Defendant:
Hardeman County Corr. Facility and Anthony Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
