Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Steed v. Lynch et al
as 5:2024ct03105
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Bunn, Sgt. Hobgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLARY v. STEWARD et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant:
FNU STEWARD, FNU HARGROVE, SERGEANT RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. YATES et al
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
ANTWAIN PORTER
Defendant:
YATES, ALFRED ALONZO SCOTT, JR., HARGROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, ASSOCIATE WARDEN, TODD E. ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR and others
MCCRAY v. BROADY et al
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
ARMANI MCCRAY
Defendant:
TEONNA BROADY, FNU SAMPSON, FNU RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Balrus Gernegen
as 23-6988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, Scotland Correctional Institute Acting MCON Unit Manager, MARCUS SCOTT, a/k/a Ronnie Scott, Scotland Correctional Institute MCON Unit Manager, MR. CAPTAIN INGRAM, Scotland Correctional Institute and others
Charlie Hardin v. Superintendent Roach
as 23-6973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROACH, SUPERINTENDENT ALBRIGHT, SUPERINTENDENT CROWE and others
US v. Tyren Hargrove
as 23-4551
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TYREN OMARIOUS HARGROVE
US v. Terrell Hargrove
as 23-6842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRELL ANTHONY HARGROVE, a/k/a Rell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
