Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Hargrove v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 2:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Laura N. Hargrove
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process
Hargrove v. Hamilton
as 1:2020cv01188
Respondent:
Israel Hamilton
Petitioner:
Jamiel M. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hargrove v. Bolster
as 3:2019cv00784
Defendant:
Mark Bolster
Plaintiff:
John E. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A Village Youth and Family Services, Inc. et al v. The Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 1:2019cv01237
Defendant:
Daniel Carey, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Virginia Health and Human Services, Anthem BlueCross BlueShield, Ralph Northam, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Civitas Health Services, Inc., Strategic Youth Services, LLC, New Growth Behavioral Health, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Mr. Bolster
as 3:2019cv00645
Respondent:
Mr. Bolster
Petitioner:
John E. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lindsey v. Jewett, et al.
as 3:2019cv00634
Defendant:
Donna Lythgoe, Sandra Ceruti, Denise Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Vicki A. Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Keyes v. Swann et al
as 3:2019cv00564
Plaintiff:
Darnell Alonzo Keyes and Darnell Alonzo Keys
Defendant:
R.N. Walton, Ms. Cunningham, A.W. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00364
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John E. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Hargrove
as 1:2018cv00558
Plaintiff:
JaQuan T. Jones
Defendant:
George Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hargrove v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Hargrove
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
