Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Derek Harmon, Sr. v. Coleman Worldwide Moving, LLC
as 24-1413
Plaintiff:
DEREK KENT HARMON, SR.
Defendant:
COLEMAN WORLDWIDE MOVING, LLC
USA v. Jordan Harmon
as 24-1797
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JORDAN DONYELL HARMON
Harmon et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Landon Gage Harmon and Aimee Elizabeth Tewes
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Harmon v. Coleman Worldwide Moving, LLC
as 1:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Harmon, Sr.
Defendant:
Coleman Worldwide Moving, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11706 Carmack Amendent
Holt, et al. v. Urban League of Portland, Inc., et al.
as 24-633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN HOLT, an individual and TRY EXCELLENCE, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND, INC., Urban League of Portland, Inc. an Oregon Domestic non-profit corporation, NKENGE HARMON-JOHNSON, individually and as President and CEO of THE URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND, INC., MICHAEL LEWELLEN, individually and as Board Chairman of THE URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND, INC. and others
Schultz-Harmon et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Marie Schultz-Harmon and Brian Harmon
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Kellogg v. Nichols
as 23-8093
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY KELLOGG and JONATHAN HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN C. NICHOLS, individually and in his capacity as statutory licensing officer pursuant to Penal Law 265.00 (10); 400.00, et seq.
Frank Black v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
as 23-2297
Petitioner:
FRANK HARMON BLACK and SOUTHEAST INVESTMENTS, N.C., INC.
Respondent:
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY and SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
