Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MOTTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, SHARON MILLER, Issam Harmoush and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTTON, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOTTON v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv01693
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOTTON, II and CHARLES MOTTON, III
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC WOOTEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwayne Smiley, Sr. v. Issam Harmoush, et al
as 18-40344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE ANTHONY SMILEY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ISSAM HARMOUSH, Doctor, H. PLESSALA, Aid, E. SONIER, Administrator and others
Brown v. Ong et al
as 1:2017cv00439
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Brown
Defendant:
Edgardo Ong, Yu Lin, H Plessala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Harmoush et al
as 1:2017cv00305
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Garza
Defendant:
FNU Harmoush, MLP Plessala, HSS Sonnier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Segovia-Lopez v. Mr Sonnier et al
as 1:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Javier Segovia-Lopez
Defendant:
Mr Sonnier, Mrs Sonnier, Mr McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smiley v. Harmoush et al
as 1:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anthony Smiley, Sr
Defendant:
Issam Harmoush, H Plessala, E Sonier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salazar v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Ricky Salazar
Defendant:
United States of America, Leaague Medical Concepts, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buchanan v. University of Texas Medical et al
as 1:2017cv00076
Plaintiff:
Earl Buchanan
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical, League Medical Concept, Bureau of prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buchanan v. University of Texas Medical et al
as 5:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Earl Buchanan
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical, League Medical Concept, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
