Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Harker v. Libe et al
as 4:2012cv00276
Plaintiff:
John Harker
Defendant:
Sonia Libe, Brad Hoenig, Mick Geerdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harker et al v. Beauchamp, et al
as 4:2011cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Harker, Adam Little, Jason Wheeler and others
Defendant:
Asa Beauchamp, Tyrell Dermer, Mick Geerdas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harness et al v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 5:2011cv06091
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harness and Mary Harness
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. Lloyd International, Inc v. Wei Har Yip et al
as 1:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
J. Lloyd International, Inc
Defendant:
Wei Har Yip and Toy Zone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cuellar v. Harness et al
as 4:2010cv00383
Plaintiff:
James Richard Cuellar
Defendant:
Harness and Scott Ruppert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxi-Seal Harness Systems, Inc. v. R.A. Phillips Industries, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00098
Plaintiff:
Maxi-Seal Harness Systems, Inc., Maxi-Seal Harness Systems, Inc. and Maxi-Seal Harness Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
R.A. Phillips Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Merchant v. Miller County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2009cv04136
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Jean Merchant
Defendant:
Miller County, Arkansas, H L Phillips, Linda Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rain and Hail, L.L.C. v. Harness
as 4:2007mc00510
Plaintiff:
Rain and Hail, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Cecil Harness, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-1785
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Green v. Texarkana, Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2007cv04032
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Green
Defendant:
Texarkana, Arkansas, City of, Texarkana, Arkansas, City of, Todd Harness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
