Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Caplan v. Harold Dixon Transmission Specialists, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60526
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
HAROLD DIXON TRANSMISSION SPECIALISTS INC., HAROLD DIXON and JEANNAE DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dixon et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2018cv01125
Plaintiff:
Harold Dixon and Julie Dixon
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westheimer Regency I, L.P. v. Bally Total Fitness Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00215
Defendant:
Bally Total Fitness Corporation, Blast Fitness Acquisition, LLC, Blast Fitness Presidents Square LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Westheimer Regency I, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Westheimer Regency I, L.P. v. Bally Total Fitness Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00214
Defendant:
Bally Total Fitness Corporation, Blast Fitness Acquisition, LLC, Blast Fitness Presidents Square LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Westheimer Regency I, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
W.M. et al v. GISCOMBE et al
as 1:2015cv00305
Plaintiff:
W.M. , ERICA M. and MARK M.
Defendant:
EVERT GISCOMBE, PATRICIA MORRIS, HAROLD DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Dixon et al
as 0:2014mc61350
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harold Dixon and Jennae Dixon
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Dixon v. Town of Coats and the Board of Adjustments for the Town of Coats et al
as 5:2008cv00489
Plaintiff:
Harold Dixon
Defendant:
Town of Coats and the Board of Adjustments for the Town of Coats, Town of Coats and the Board of Adjustments for the Town of Coats, Charles Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alphonso, et al v. Osceola Farms Co
as 9:2005cv80825
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Howell, Stanford Brown, Rayon Anderson and others
Defendant:
Osceola Farms Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
