Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Sundaramurthy v. Abbott Vascular, Inc.
as 25-1440
Plaintiff:
MALAIPERUMA SUNDARAMURTHY
Defendant:
ABBOTT VASCULAR, INC.
Interested Party:
VHS ACQUISITION SUBSIDIARY NUMBER 7, INC. and DR. HAROLD MOORE
ESTATE OF K. MUHAMMAD/ HAROLD MOORE JR. v. Unknown Defendant
as 2:2025cv02537
Claimant:
ESTATE OF K. MUHAMMAD/ HAROLD MOORE JR.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
v. estate of k. Muhammad/ Harold Moore Jr.
as 2:2025cv02536
Claimant:
estate of k. Muhammad/ Harold Moore Jr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Estate of Khallid Muhammad et al v. Tupac Shakur Estate et al
as 2:2025cv02540
Plaintiff:
Estae of Khallid Muhammad, Harold Moore, Jr. and Paula White-Rushidding
Defendant:
Tupac Shakur Estate, Interscope Records, Songs of Universal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
v. ESTATE OF K.MUHAMMAD / HAROLD MOORE JR.
as 2:2025cv02526
Claimant:
ESTATE OF K.MUHAMMAD / HAROLD MOORE JR.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Estate of K. Muhammad et al v. Public Enemy et al
as 2:2025cv02324
Plaintiff:
Estate of K. Muhammad, Harold Moore, Jr. and Paula White-Rushiddin
Defendant:
Public Enemy, Carlton Douglas Ridenhour, William Jonathan Drayton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Moore et al v. AMG Logistics, INC et al
as 2:2024cv04078
Plaintiff:
Harold Moore and Linda Nichols
Defendant:
Duc Duong and AMG Logistics, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Gregory Moore
as 21-5239
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY HAROLD MOORE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Moore v. TD Ameritrade
as 1:2020cv02990
Plaintiff:
John Harold Moore
Defendant:
TD Ameritrade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
