Cases 1 - 10 of 1,945
Timmons v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dwayne Timmons, III
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, David O. Livingston, Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayburne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B. Powell, S. Arana and D. Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Marquez et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
G. Marquez, D. Baker and David Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Hart et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
C/O Hart, C/O Bent, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Ivey et al
as 9:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Rashad Bell
Defendant:
Ronald Ivey, Lynesha Square and Haleigh Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Angela Harper
Defendant:
Russell Skinner, Clint Hickman, Dawn Noggle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
