Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Painter v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv00990
Defendant:
SAMUEL CARTER GREENE, PAULA GREENE PAINTER, HARRISON GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
J & P ENTERPRISES OF THE CAROLINAS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mooney v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024cv00168
Defendant:
FNU Harrison, FNU Baker, FNU Church and others
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mooney v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024ct03178
Defendant:
Warden Parker, Officer Chapelle, Officer Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024ct03160
Plaintiff:
Terek Harper
Defendant:
Shannon Eames and Jodi Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00496
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Harrison
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
MCCANTS v. HARRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
TRAVUS MCCANTS
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU WOODARD, CHUM HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MR. NEU, ZERRANTI MCLEAN and others
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCants v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024cv00132
Defendant:
FNU Woodard, Chum Harrison, FNU Nealy and others
Plaintiff:
Travus McCants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. CLAYTON et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
GERALD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS R HARRISON, EDWARD HOUGH WILLAFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. USA
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Harrison
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
