Cases 1 - 10 of 848
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Winkler v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Sonya Winkler
Defendant:
David John Harris, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Loraine v. Steuben County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Edward Loraine
Defendant:
Steuben County Sheriff, Braxton Amos, Shane Matchette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HARRIS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00699
Petitioner:
JOHN HARRIS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MILLS et al v. HARRIS
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Stephanie MILLS, doing business as CJM, LLC, STEPHANIE MILLS and CJM LLC
Defendant:
TONY HARRIS A/K/A AMP HARRIS, D/B/A AMP PRODUCTIONS, INC and TONY HARRIS A/K/A AMP HARRIS, D/B/A AMP HARRIS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Powers-Ivey v. Harris
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powers-Ivey and Tyrone Powres-Ivey
Defendant:
R Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILZEN v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
KORRTEL FILZEN
Defendant:
JACKSON and HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
