Cases 1 - 10 of 30
James v. NCDAC - Division of Prisons et al
as 5:2023ct03341
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Defendant:
NCDAC - Division of Prisons, Officer Gaskins, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harry James-El v. Eric Hooks
as 23-6566
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIC HOOKS
James et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03237
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James, Larry Robinson, Anthony Michael Finney and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harry James v. US
as 22-6388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harry James v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 22-6317
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH E. LASSITER, TOM BRICKHOUSE, INA HINTON and others
Harry James v. Eddie Buffaloe, Jr.
as 22-6240
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES, a/k/a Harry Sharod James-El
Respondent / Appellee:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety
James v. Peoples Republic of China et al
as 5:2022ct03007
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James and Moustapha Sharod Khalifa-El
Defendant:
Peoples Republic of China, Wuhan Institute of Virology and Chinese Communist Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS
as 1:2021cv00934
Petitioner:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. Craggy Correctional Center Mail Room et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James and Harry Sharod James-El
Defendant:
Craggy Correctional Center Mail Room, Eric A. Hooks and North Carolina Department of Public Safety-DAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. United States
as 5:2021ct03191
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
