Cases 1 - 10 of 50
San Juana Rodriguez-Gonzalez et al v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2024cv04685
Defendant:
California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Wellpath Inc., Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
J. Luis Duron-Luevano, San Juana Rodriguez-Gonzalez and Miguel Angel Duron-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
David Lee Smith
Defendant:
Heath Jackson, Lt. Richard Hetrick, Wade L. Hartly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond v. Coleman USP I Complex et al
as 5:2020cv00284
Defendant:
FNU Brown, Kathy Lane, R.C. Cheatham and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hopkins v. Ramisch et al
as 1:2017cv02242
Plaintiff:
Austin Hopkins
Defendant:
Rick Ramisch, Hartly, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartly et al v. Firstsource Advantage, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01172
Defendant:
American Express Company and Firstsource Advantage, LLC
Plaintiff:
Evan Hartly and Michelle Hartly
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Hartly v. Barclays Bank Delaware
as 3:2017cv00995
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware
Plaintiff:
Evan Hartly
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Buchanan v. Discover Bank
as 1:2017cv00750
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Discover Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Buchanan v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Buchanan v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.,
as 1:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Buchanan v. Comenity Bank
as 1:2017cv00615
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Comenity Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
