Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Danny Wolfe v. Harvey Lappin, et al
as 13-1831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY G. WOLFE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARVEY G. LAPPIN, Director, MICHAEL K. NALLEY, Regional Director, BRUCE BLEDSOE, Former Warden and others
Andre Drew v. Harvey Lappin, et al
as 12-16738
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE DREW
Defendant - Appellee:
HARVEY G. LAPPIN, CRAIG APKER and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
RAINES v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2011cv06214
Plaintiff:
JAMES O. RAINES, JR
Defendant:
HARVEY G. LAPPIN, CHARLES SAMUELS and TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00450
Plaintiff:
Danny Gene Wolfe
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Michael K. Nalley, Bruce Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00215
Plaintiff:
Danny Gene Wolfe
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, USA, G. Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holmes v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 2:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Holmes
Defendant:
Harvey G Lappin, Darlene Drew, Tovia Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Beltran et al
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
Danny Gene Wolfe
Defendant:
V A Beltran, A Martinez, Karen Edenfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00003
Defendant:
Joseph Archer, N. Ausch, Robert Beaudouin and others
Plaintiff:
L.C. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Judd v. United States of America et al
as 5:2010cv00240
Plaintiff:
Keith Russell Judd
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Eric Holder, U. S. Attorney General and others
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U. S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv08957
Plaintiff:
L.C. Cohen
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Harvey G. Lappin, Dudley Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
