Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 16-1042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Inez Hunter
Defendant / Appellee:
Ford Motor Company, in Dearborn MI, Citi Financial Auto, ("CFA") a corporation in Bedford, TX, Hastings Automotive Inc., ("HAI"), in Hastings, MN and others
Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 16-1042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Inez Hunter
Defendant - Appellee:
Ford Motor Company, in Dearborn MI, Citi Financial Auto, ("CFA") a corporation in Bedford, TX, Hastings Automotive Inc., ("HAI"), in Hastings, MN and others
Hastings Chrysler Center, Inc. et al v. Sebelius et al
as 0:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
Hastings Chrysler Center, Inc. , Douglas W. Erickson and Hastings Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Thomas Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC v. Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD
as 1:2012cv02048
Plaintiff:
Walker Motor Company, Beine Automotive of Southwest Missouri, LLC, Taj Mahal Auto Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Mahindra & Mahindra, LTD. and Global Vehicles U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 10-3288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Inez Hunter
Defendant / Appellee:
Ford Motor Company, in Dearborn MI, Citi Financial Auto, ("CFA") a corporation in Bedford, TX, Hastings Automotive Inc., ("HAI"), in Hastings, MN and others
Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 10-3288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Inez Hunter
Defendant - Appellee:
Ford Motor Company, in Dearborn MI, Citi Financial Auto, ("CFA") a corporation in Bedford, TX, Hastings Automotive Inc., ("HAI"), in Hastings, MN and others
Hunter v Ford Motor Company et al
as 0:2008cv04980
Plaintiff:
Inez Hunter
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Chrysler, LLC., Citi Financial Auto and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
