Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Ashad v. Connolly et al
as 3:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Malia Ashad
Defendant:
Ryan Connolly, Collin Lenahan, Robinderpal Hayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Amardeep Trucking, Inc. et al.
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Isaac Rodriguez
Defendant:
Amardeep Trucking, Inc. and Jagroop S. Hayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
XYZ Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv16562
Plaintiff:
XYZ Corporation and Bubblegum Stuff LTD
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, BSRTOP-US, Foshan Bifuyi Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
(PC) Eslami v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eslami
Defendant:
G. Matteson, T. Tyler, J. Cavagnolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Vaughan-Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Victor Velasco
Defendant:
Vaughan-Williams, Losty, Hayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayer v. Liverant
as 3:2022cv05420
Plaintiff:
Julia Hayer
Defendant:
Alex Liverant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Rahim v. Barsto et al
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Rahim
Defendant:
Barsto, Campbell, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hayer
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hayer v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2020cv01964
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Hayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayer v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2020at00959
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Hayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
