Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Eric Draper v. Katherine Moore, et al
as 16-60203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC N. DRAPER
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT KATHERINE MOORE, Hearing Officer, ANDREW MILLS, Deputy Warden and MICHAEL WEEKS
William Browder v. Tom Garey, et al
as 16-40285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. BROWDER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM GAREY, S. FLECHER, BRAD LIVINGSTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-41620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-41615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hills v. Campos et al
as 9:2015cv00157
Petitioner:
Elridge V Hills, Jr
Defendant:
E Campos, M Martinez, Disciplinary Hearing Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Turner et al
as 3:2015cv00630
Plaintiff:
David Ray White
Defendant:
Marshall Turner, CMCF Hearing Officer Doe #1 and CMCF Hearing Officer Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damian Laphand v. Norris Hogans, et al
as 15-60586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMIAN LAPHAND
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN NORRIS HOGANS, East Mississippi Correctional Facility, LIEUTENANT WARREN, District Hearing Officer and SERGEANT VEST, District Investigator
Lisa Biron v. Jody Upton, et al
as 15-10684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA A. BIRON
Defendant - Appellee:
JODY UPTON, Federal Medical Center Carswell Warden, LAUREN CIMPERMAN, Psy. D., FNU WENGER, Special Investigative Services Officer and others
Employer Solutions Staffing v. OCAHO, et al
as 15-60173
Petitioner:
EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP II, L.L.C.
Respondent:
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-60044
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
