Cases 11 - 20 of 1,251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
White et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01605
Plaintiff:
Heather White and Randy White
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Achs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shawn Achs, Chad Purdon, Leah Purdon and others
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Murphy v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Heather Dalton
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Heather L Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hill v. Cooper
as 6:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Melissa Hill
Defendant:
Heather N. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Stewart v. McCracken County Jail
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Heather Stewart
Defendant:
McCracken County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solimine v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Heather Solimine
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gaddie v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
LaRico Dwayne Gaddie, Sr.
Defendant:
David Knight, Steven Carter, Darryl Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
