Cases 41 - 50 of 11,911
Valenzuela (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Heather Valenzuela
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weldy, Heather v. O'Malley, Martin
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Heather Marie Weldy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
White et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01605
Plaintiff:
Heather White and Randy White
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EVANS v. LEBLANC et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
PARIS DEMETRIUS EVANS
Defendant:
BOB LEBLANC, GARY E MOLEK, HEATHER DANIELLE PASTOOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hillbom v. R1 RCM, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Heather Hillbom
Defendant:
R1 RCM, Inc. and Dignity Health doing business as Dignity Health - St. Rose Dominican Hospital, Rose de Lima Campus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Goolsby et al v. Wanabana LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21249
Plaintiff:
Eric Goolsby and Heather Goolsby
Defendant:
Wanabana LLC and Wanabana USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Quarles v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Allan Quarles
Defendant:
James Youngkin, Eric Wiltrout, C.O. Trouchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Boersma v. Armstrong
as 24-2090
Plaintiff:
HEATHER LYNN BOERSMA
Defendant:
SEAN ARMSTRONG, Marion County Circuit Court Judge
Mathis v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Eugenio S. Mathis
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alisha Tafoya Lucero, Wence Asonganyi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
