Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Hensley v. Engler et al
as 5:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jason Hensley
Defendant:
John A. Engler, Megan E. Gooding, North Carolina Medical Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MciLwain v. Hensley et al
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Cedric MciLwain
Defendant:
Nicholas Hensley, Ashley Robertson and Tyler Silver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Simmons v. Hensley
as 5:2023ct03016
Plaintiff:
Larice Simmons
Defendant:
Ms. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Dennis v. Torrez et al
as 5:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Defendant:
FNU Torrez, FNU Cook, Whatt White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dade v. Church et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Deeshun Dade
Defendant:
FNU Church, FNU Shields, FNU Reyburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. McDowell County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Martin Ray Robinson, James Julius Lumpkin, David Kenneth Fowler and others
Defendant:
McDowell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensley v. City of Charlotte
as 3:2020cv00482
Plaintiff:
Johnathan S. Hensley
Defendant:
City of Charlotte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hensley v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2019cv00114
Petitioner:
Sammy Lee Hensley, Sr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
